The inquiry

Learning to work
skillfully with attention.

What has our attention? What shapes it? And what becomes possible when we understand our attention more clearly?

A working meaning.

Attentional literacy means understanding attention, recognizing what shapes it, and working with it deliberately in personal and shared life.

This is the Collective’s developing definition. The work asks what people need to know, notice, understand, and be able to do. It includes the ability to recognize our own experience and the conditions around it.

In an ordinary conversation, someone might be concentrating on a reply while overlooking what the other person is trying to communicate. A digital environment might offer an inviting next step that differs from the purpose for which someone opened it. These are examples for inquiry, rather than findings from a Stillwater study.

02 / The framework

Working skillfully with attention

Four functions, applied in personal and shared life

Personal and relationalattention

Notice

What has my attention?

Recognize shifts and omissions.

Interpret

What may be shaping it?

Check influences and understanding.

Judge

What deserves attention here?

Consider purpose and consequences.

Enact and adapt

What response would help?

Try, use support and review.

Knowledge, conditions and support contribute across all four functions.The functions can overlap and recur. An action need not follow a fixed sequence. Draft 0.2.

03 / The working answer

What does a person actually need to know, notice, understand, and be able to do to become attentionally literate?

Know
Attention is selective and limited, shaped by intentions, habits, and conditions.
Notice
Where my attention goes, what draws it, and what or whom I may overlook.
Understand
How my state and surroundings shape attention, and how my attention affects others.
Be able to do
Choose what deserves attention, adjust how I engage, check understanding, use support, and review what helped.

Educational aim

Greater awareness and agency

with consideration for others.

The Evermay working answer, expressed through the proposed competencies. Draft 0.2.

Personal and shared life.

Personal

What am I noticing?

The direction of attention, a change in interest, a judgment, or the possibility of staying, shifting, and returning.

Relational

Whom am I hearing?

The other person’s meaning, the space a conversation allows, and the perspectives that might be receiving less attention.

Environmental

What shapes the field?

The design of a platform, the conditions in a classroom, or the demands of a shared setting. Personal choice takes place within conditions.

Calling attention a public skill expresses the project’s educational and social purpose. It asks how understanding attention might matter beyond individual concentration, including listening, participation, and consideration for others.

Different sources.
Careful distinctions.

The inquiry puts contemplative sources into conversation with cognitive science and education. Each offers different questions, methods, and standards of evidence.

  1. Contemplative inquiry

    One source example is MN 10, The Establishing of Mindfulness Discourse. Its section on mind includes recognizing scatteredness and concentration. The text belongs to a Buddhist path with ethical aims; an everyday educational application is an interpretation by this project.

    Read MN 10, section C: Mind ↗
  2. Attention research

    Petersen and Posner’s 2012 review describes attention in terms of multiple networks and functions. It offers background for asking more precise questions about attention. It does not validate Stillwater’s working definition, framework, or educational approach.

    Petersen & Posner, The Attention System of the Human Brain: 20 Years After ↗
  3. Educational development

    The research priority is a competency framework that can inform a developmental pathway for attentional literacy across K–12. A proposed middle school prototype and a later evaluation plan will help make the learning questions concrete.

    Read the current work →

The project does not equate mindfulness with attention, treat different contemplative traditions as interchangeable, or assume that a useful practice establishes a scientific mechanism.

Questions still open.

  • Which distinctions help people understand their attention without oversimplifying it?
  • How might the complexity of attentional skills develop across K–12, and what would show useful learning?
  • How can learning account for different people, settings, and possibilities for choice?
  • What should a framework include about listening and shared life?
  • What does this framework contribute alongside existing work on mindfulness, metacognition, self-regulation, and media literacy?
  • What evidence would be needed to judge the usefulness of an educational approach?

The next stage is to make these questions specific enough to examine, review, and revise.

Begin with an ordinary moment.

The conversation reflection offers one way to observe attention without a score or a prescribed outcome.

Read the reflection